The Last Drink In The Last Chance Saloon


It is roughly seventeen months since this project started. Despite all of the revelations from this blog, and from other ‘new media’ outlets, little has changed in the world of Scottish football. This might seem a strange claim given that the largest football club in the country has become insolvent and now sits on corporate death-row awaiting its execution. However, the major institutions that feed on the blood of Scottish football fans: the SFA; the SPL; and the newspapers- appear to have learned little from events in this time.

They still believe that the people who pay their wages are imbeciles. They still dish out fatuous lies and peddle disinformation as if Sir David Murray was still in his heyday. The hysterical exaggerations and tales of impending financial doom should be transparent to the businessmen who fill most of the Chairman roles at Scottish football clubs. Anyone with even a few minutes of business experience will see through the lies of the Scottish football establishment. These scare stories are not the issue. It is the dangling of long requested changes in the structure of the Scottish game that will present clubs from both the Scottish Premier League and the Scottish Football League with a dilemma.

From their public statements, it is clear that the driving forces behind this attempt at league-rigging are SFA Chief Executive Stewart Regan and SPL Chief Executive Neil Doncaster. Despite being paid to promote the Scottish game, they have spent recent weeks trying to convince advertisers and TV companies that their product is worthless without someone representing Rangers’ legacy playing in the SFL1 next season. It is as if Sevco Ltd was a panacea and that this new club will be guaranteed promotion to the SPL within a single season.

Let us be in no doubt. Scottish football faces a period of turmoil and some financial belt-tightening regardless of what happens in any of the upcoming votes. (If Servco Ltd are forced to start in SFL3, the nattering nabobs of the mainstream Scottish sports press will doubtless blame every player transfer and setback on ‘internet bampots’ and shortsighted fans of so-called ‘diddy teams’). The Scottish game became unsustainable and unhealthily unbalanced towards just two clubs. In an era when it is easy to watch the best football from every country all week long, we need to extract the cancers that have been devouring our game for over twenty years rather than battling to preserve them. Among the assorted symptoms of the illness facing our game are:

  • Scottish football has failed to develop a single stand-out talent since the early 1980s
  • Scottish football has been spending more than it takes in for far too long
  • Scottish football has fallen far behind global standards in the quality of entertainment it offers

Scottish football had become dull and uninteresting for all but the fans of the two clubs that could entertain thoughts of ever winning the league.

There is a now a golden opportunity for creative minds to remake the game. Instead, we have intellectual pygmies telling us that everything in Scottish football is fantastic and must be saved at all costs. What is worth saving? Declining attendances? A terrible set of TV contracts that do not realise the full value of the Scottish game? A national team that cannot qualify for any international competitions? We have a game that is viewed with universal contempt for both its lack of technical quality and the lopsidedness of its top division. This is where our game finds itself almost three decades after the “Souness Revolution” started at Rangers. The false economies started by David Holmes, and placed on steroids by David Murray, eventually devastated all around it. Rangers embodied the ideas that financial might made right and reckless spending was the key to success. Their demise should be a cautionary tale to others to get their house in order. Instead, the Scottish football establishment wants to send the signal that if you are going to fail, make sure you do it on a spectacular scale: we will make everyone else carry you if it goes wrong.

Mr. Doncaster trained as a lawyer and has an MBA. If Scottish football was a case study at a business school, anyone submitting a paper that recommended crushing the last remnants of fairness in the game to prop up a failed old-order would not get a passing mark. Doncaster in particular is failing. (Funny that Messers Doncaster & Regan find it so easy to predict the effects of Sevco Ltd playing in SFL3, but could not use these same skills to anticipate Rangers’ implosion. Even when the aforementioned ‘internet bampots’ had warned years earlier of a crisis brewing at Ibrox, the men with the crystal ball today were unable to see something that was so obvious). When the dust settles on this disaster one way or another, one can only hope that Doncaster and Regan have absented themselves. It is clear that they lack the imaginations required to improve our game. Our hopes for restoring the thrill of Scottish football now rests on the men who run the clubs in the SPL and the SFL. We must hope that they have the backbone to stand-up to being bullied and the foresight to realise that all that is being dangled by Regan & Doncaster can be obtained anyway- without sacrificing the game and without the hired hands for whom this all appears to be just a job.

If fairness fails and Sevco Ltd is able to field a team in the SFL1 next season, it is for each fan to make an individual decision on whether it is worth returning to watch a game played with loaded dice. For those who do decide to go back (I am still undecided), something will still be missing in the game. An unfillable void will have opened. The men who will vote on this decision have to realise that they are not just voting on short-term revenues. They are going to irreparably alter the Scottish game whatever happens. Money will ebb and flow in football in proportion to the excitement and quality of the competition. If fans believe that there is no competition because a winner is preordained, money will leave and it will stay gone.

______________________________________________________

Poll:

Trying something new. Bear with me if this turns out to be a bridge too far for my technical skills.

About rangerstaxcase
I have information on Rangers' tax case, and I will use this blog to provide the details of what Rangers FC have done, why it was illegal, and what the implications for what was (updated) one of the largest football clubs in Britain.

7,916 Responses to The Last Drink In The Last Chance Saloon

  1. easyJambo says:

    Lucculent Sam says: 17/07/2012 at 11:52 am

    There are two issues as play. You are right that a newco cannot legally be held responsible for the oldco’s sins. However, if newco wish to either maintain or transfer the history or the league share/membership of the oldco, then there is a strong case for the newco having to accept the oldco’s sanctions.

    Similarly, if Sevco claim to be a brand new club, the SFA and SFL are withith their rights to impose conditions on their entry to those associations in return for bypassing the normal conditions of entry, e.g. 3 years accounts and facing competition from other potential new entrants.

    I am surprised that The Blue Knights, in particular, did not bite the bullet earlier and set up “FC Rangers of Govan” as the true blue successors to the oldco. I think thay might have won over more supporters by setting up a brand new club and applying to the SFL in the normal way, free of sanctions, but with a strong business case of carrying the bulk of the support with them. They could have frozen out Sevco as a club by renting Ibrox, or agreeing a ground share at Hampden or elsewhere, while they built up some reserves and goodwill, but that opportunity seems to have gone for the moment.

  2. StevieBC says:

    joe mccormack says:
    17/07/2012 at 11:56 am

    So finally the Compliance Officer will be having a look at McCoist’s ‘who are these people’ outburst.

    =========================================================

    SFA confirm they are indeed going to follow up – good !

    And I wonder if McCoist will have the gall to belatedly attempt a proper apology via the media…?
    No, he wouldn’t be that cynical would he… 🙄

  3. Jim M says:

    So poor wee Charlie’s off to UEFA asking not to have to pay the sins of his father ( Oldco in Liq) which, in case he forgot, he willingly bought.
    Seems to me UEFA could come out as good guys here once they stop laughing.
    OK, Charlie, we”ll ask Everton to pass all future Jelavic payments to us and use these to pay Rapid, Hearts, Chelsea and all the others you owe from your previous life. Bye
    I reckon these will be just about close to a net zero.
    Reality of course if they will not agree or this would create a stampede of similar request a across Europe and spread to FIFA.
    For any other club this request would be treated with withering contempt by the media but since this is Sevco we are taking about…or is it Rangers?

    Stupid, stupid, Charlie…..

  4. Para Handy says:

    redetin says:
    17/07/2012 at 10:59 am
     1 0 Rate This
    redetin says:
    17/07/2012 at 10:57 am

    That quote, btw, was from someone in the Bush administration.
    —————————

    Ahhh… So that’s why it made no sense at all. Thanks Redetin.

  5. Tic 6709 says:

    Nowoldandgrumpy @ 11.46.am Brilliant.

  6. Alasdair Barratt (@alinalmeria) says:
    17/07/2012 at 10:20 am

    Marvelous

    Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant
    While we’re being helpful to Mr Green, it’s worth pointing out UEFA are based in Nyon, not Zurich. Just to save two wasted trips

    ————————————————————————————

    Probably why he’s flying Easyjet to Lyon. It’s only a capital away.

    Flywheel

  7. Casual Observer says:

    Lifted from CQN earlier:

    The Battered Bunnet on 17 July, 2012 at 10:37 said:

    The purpose of the requirement to provide three years’ accounts is largely a risk mitigation measure. The Governing Bodies have a responsibility to their members to ensure that they individually and collectively are not unduly exposed to commercial risks associated with the financial failure of one of the competitor clubs.

    Indeed, the requirement is not for 3 years accounts alone, but for 3 years of unencumbered trading history, demonstrating that the applicant’s business model and management are appropriate to the scale and nature of the environment in which they play.

    The requirements become greater as the level of competition increases, bringing with it increased commercial impacts, and indeed, increased risk to the structure of the relevant competition that may be realised in the event that a competitor fails financially.

    Equally, the requirement to disclose the beneficial owners of a club is also related to risk. Clubs trade together, and again from a risk mitigation perspective, it is important that clubs know who they are dealing with, cf Craig Whyte-Hearts-Lee Wallace.

    It appears from comments to date that Sevco does not satisfy the criteria to hold SFA membership in its own right.

    Paradoxically, it does apparently meet the criteria to hold the SFA membership formerly held by Rangers, should the SFA decide to transfer that membership. (When someone explains this logically I will eat my bunnet.)

    The SFA, in considering transferring RFC’s membership to Sevco, wishes to protect the game and reassert its authority. It seeks to protect the game by demanding the football debts attaching to RFC’s membership are settled by Sevco, total around £3M we understand.

    The authority aspects relate to outstanding disciplinary cases against RFC.

    The simplest solution to all of this, Risk and Authority, is to require Sevco to pay a part-refundable fee to the SFA in exchange for a new membership, part of which fee pays RFC’s legacy football debt, the remainder of which held in bond to offset any financial risks in the absence of the necessary trading history, and refunded at the conclusion of 3 years unbroken participation.

    Authority can then be reasserted by progressing the various disciplinary matters that will inevitably result in RFC being expelled from the SFA.

    This route is a more satisfactory one for the members of the SFA as a whole because the Risks associated with a Sevco membership are as great whether they hold RFC’s old membership following transfer, or hold a new membership in their own right. By holding a 3 year bond on the new membership, risk is reduced and governance principles satisfied.

    All provided Charlie Green will disclose who owns Sevco, of course.

    What’s the hold up?

  8. joe mccormack says:

    Good point about a bond.

    Have HMRC not asked for a similar bond?

  9. jockybhoy says:

    Notoverthehill says: 17/07/2012 at 12:03 pm

    Plugging Sevco’s finance gap is easy. I would happily pay to watch the SPL’s Celtic gub Div3’s Renegers home and away pre-season. Maybe they can just reverse seating arrangements at Ibrox – after all I imagine Celtic will be bringing the bulk of the support… 😉

  10. Scapa says:

    Casual Observer says:

    17/07/2012 at 12:20 pm

    From a risk management perspective, I can’t fault the Bunnet’s argument. Good post.

  11. ziggydoc says:

    Richard Wilson (@timomouse) says:
    17/07/2012 at 10:57 am
     4 0 Rate This
    New Blog: http://www.thefootballlife.co.uk/post/27399786959/dont-dream-its-over

    Interesting summary Richard. For myself, I now feel as if the roller coaster element has been removed, with no acceptance of a pitiful CVA and eventual start in D3. Obviously there’s are a lot more interesting times ahead but at least I won’t be shouting at the TV or radio at some inept journalist (with my wife staring at me strangely) and will sleep easier. Some major battles have been won but the cold war continues and is hellava interesting. When it’s eventually over, what the hell are we going to do ? Cold Turkey lies ahead at some point.

  12. ziggydoc says:

    Anyone heard any news on the Westminster committee on the state of Scottish football ?
    I can’t see any schedule for it yet.

  13. easyJambo says:

    embradon says: 17/07/2012 at 12:12 pm

    I watched all Hearts U19 games last season and I would have put them as the equivalent of a mid table side in SFL Div 2. Technically they would be better, but they would be at risk of being phisically intimidated by adult players in some games.

    Moving the age range to U20 (plus a couple of overage players) will make the youth sides even stronger this season. Hearts U20s won a pre season tournament at Oban last weekend with competition from Hamilton (close to 1st team), Alloa (1st team), Dudee Utd (U20s) St Johnstone (U20s) and the local amateur side. Hearts also had 5 x U20s away with the 1st team against Raith so it wasn’t their strongest side they could have fielded by any means.

    Going back to RFC/Sevco, they will have in excess of 100 kids in their pro youth academy squads from U11 up. I guess that it will depend on whether or not funds will be available to maintain the Academy and also the parents views on the future of the club whether or not they will want their kids to stay a Murray Park. I’m sure that the scouts for many SPL clubs will have already earmarked those youngsters they would like to bring to their respective clubs.

  14. iamacant says:

    Anyone know who Brechin City have got in the second round of the Ramsdens Challenge Cup ? I can see them getting a bye in the first round 😉

  15. steve-b says:

    If as mr green states “they are a different club” why are they requesting transfer fees for the OLD clubs players? ,you can’t have your cake and eat it ………………

  16. 100bjd says:

    Casual Observer says:
    17/07/2012 at 12:20 pm
    5 0 i

    Rate This

    Lifted from CQN earlier:

    The Battered Bunnet on 17 July, 2012 at 10:37 said:
    ———————————————————————————————————–

    Good summation and agree with “what is the hold up”?

  17. raintown67 says:
    17/07/2012 at 11:23 am

    STVGrant: Scottish FA say Newco Rangers does not need to provide historic accounts as they are requesting oldco’s membership

    I thought oldco had not met the audited accounts criteria either?

    —————————————————————————————–

    Correct. But I think the issue here is for Sevco to take over Old Co and only be missing one year’s historic accounts which the SFA may give a further extended grace period for submitting provided Green accepts Old Co’s previous misdemeanours and penalties OR Sevco have to seek SFA registration as a totally new club and as such provide the three years recorded accounts (which, of course, they cannot do).

    Methinks that Regan is using the audited accounts issue as a tool to get Green to accept the sanctions / penalties / fines of Old Co. I still think at the end of the day Green will say no thank you and walk away.

    Flywheel

  18. easyJambo says:
    17/07/2012 at 12:30 pm

    embradon says: 17/07/2012 at 12:12 pm

    Going back to RFC/Sevco, they will have in excess of 100 kids in their pro youth academy squads from U11 up. I guess that it will depend on whether or not funds will be available to maintain the Academy and also the parents views on the future of the club whether or not they will want their kids to stay a Murray Park. I’m sure that the scouts for many SPL clubs will have already earmarked those youngsters they would like to bring to their respective clubs.

    ————————————————————————

    For what it’s worth. Flywheel #3’s contract with one club was not renewed at the end of May as the club brought in 2 ex-Rangers U17 players who in effect queue jumped. I suspect that this is happening around most of the clubs at youth level as budgets are tight and only so many lads can be given full-time contracts. Thankfully my lad has joined the youth set-up at another club that has been mentioned quite a lot on here recently.

    Flywheel

  19. john clarke says:

    The Board of RFC plc has a meeting scheduled for 31st July, to change the name of the club , so that Sevco, after another wee change, can change it finally to ‘The Rangers..’

    Between now and then, If Lord Hodge announces that he is satisfied with D&P’s report of what seems to have been a shambolic if not highly dodgy ‘administration’, he will presumably order the end of ‘Administration’ forthwith, and the immediate drop into Liquidation, letting BDO get right in there with full Liquidator powers .

    That would mean the current RFC plc Board and club absolutely would cease to exist as legal entities.

    There would be no club to have a meeting about, no name to change, and no directors to make such a change.

    There could therefore be no legal continuity with any newly registered club calling itself “The Rangers Ltd”.

    In those circumstances, it would be difficult to argue, justly, that footballing sanctions and penalties that the dead club might have attracted should attach to the new club.

    It should also mean the SFA should apply membership rules to the new applicant without considering in the least that any past history of the dead club has any relevance , or adds special weight, to their application, such as would allow ‘an exception’ to be made.

  20. joe mccormack says:

    I can’t help but think that Hughie has lost the plot. How can he possibly think that UEFA are going to sanction the writing off of debts due to other clubs from a Phoenix company.

    He’s inviting trouble.

    One can only imagine he will be on the first plane back with a UEFA boot lodged firmly up his erse.

  21. celtincambs says:

    Apologies if already posted.

    From the SFA’s website:
    http://www.scottishfa.co.uk/scottish_fa_news.cfm?page=1961&newsCategoryID=3&newsID=10204

    Scottish FA issues Rangers update
    Tuesday, 17 July 2012

    Now that the status of Rangers FC has been clarified by the respective league bodies, the Scottish FA has compiled the following information to provide clarity and guidance on the remaining issues to be resolved.

    When will the Scottish FA consider Rangers application for membership?

    Now that the Scottish Football League have made a conditional acceptance of Rangers FC in Irn Bru Division Three we will now consider the club’s application for membership transfer this week.

    How can Rangers be considered for membership when they can’t provide four years’ financial statements?

    Sevco Scotland Ltd bought Rangers Football Club PLC’s share in the SPL and membership of the Scottish FA as part of their acquisition of assets. Under Article 14.1, Sevco Scotland are requesting the transfer of the existing membership of Oldco. This is different to an application for a new membership, which generally requires four years of financial statements.

    When will the Appellate Tribunal be reconvened?

    The Scottish FA has been in dialogue with Rangers FC in respect of the outstanding disciplinary sanction. The decision of the Court of Session to set aside the 12-month registration embargo was complicated by Rangers FC’s administration and subsequent request from Sevco Scotland for a transfer of membership of the Scottish FA. Again, now that the club’s status has been confirmed by the SPL and SFL, we will consider the award of transfer once Rangers FC satisfy the necessary criteria.

    Will Rangers’ original punishments be transferred to Newco?

    The Scottish FA Board has the power to transfer membership under Article 14.1, which states:

    “. . . Transfer of membership will be reviewed by the Board, which will have the complete discretion to reject or to grant such application on such terms and conditions as the Board may think fit.”

    Will Ally McCoist be subject to a Compliance Officer Reference for his comments about the Judicial Panel?

    The Compliance Officer communicated with Rangers FC in mid-June to confirm that the matter has been reported and will be initiated through the normal Judicial Panel Protocol upon conclusion of the other outstanding issues affecting the club.

    In what round will Rangers Newco join the William Hill Scottish Cup?

    Under the Scottish FA’s Cup Competition Rules, Rangers FC as a third division club will join the William Hill Scottish Cup at the second round.

    Why have the Scottish FA blocked the transfer of Rangers players to other clubs?

    The Scottish FA issued a guidance note, based on legal advice and without prejudice, to both Rangers FC and PFA Scotland. Certain players have now chosen not to transfer across under TUPE regulations and, instead, agreed contracts elsewhere.

    On a procedural basis, the Scottish FA cannot process an International Transfer Certificate via FIFA’s Transfer Management System where there is an ongoing contractual dispute.

    Rangers FC have confirmed that there is such a contractual dispute. In the meantime, the new club(s) can request a temporary transfer from FIFA in order that the player(s) is free to play while the dispute process unfolds. This process has commenced in relation to a number of the players in question.

    At the request of one of the parties in dispute, the Scottish FA, through its Articles, can convene an Arbitration Panel, with either side selecting from a list of Panel members, with the two appointees subsequently selecting a Chair of the panel. Rangers FC have made such a request to the Scottish FA.

    We would naturally seek an outcome as soon as possible.

    Does the Scottish FA have a fit and proper person report for the new Rangers owner(s) and do we know who the main investors/directors are?

    The Scottish FA has received private and confidential documentation from Sevco Scotland Ltd relating to the above. We have asked Sevco to provide further supplementary information and will consider that information this week.

    Under new Scottish FA rules, it is a requirement of the outgoing club directors to conduct a full investigation under the Fit and Proper Guidelines. Given Rangers FC’s insolvency event, it has been incumbent on the administrators, Duff and Phelps, to carry out the necessary checks on the proposed new directors, as well as our own investigations.

    What is the status of the investigation into use of Employee Benefit Trusts?

    This is an investigation under the jurisdiction of the Scottish Premier League specific to player registrations. The SPL have recently confirmed they have prima facie evidence but as the potential appellate body, we cannot comment further at this stage.

  22. Essex beancounter says:

    Auldheid says:
    17/07/2012 at 9:15 am
    9 0 i
    Rate This

    Essex beancounter says:

    17/07/2012 at 7:57 am

    You can play around with the variables here

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aq2m3ggkEX2RdE1mYi1zTE9IMGlZUlpnWVltM183NVE#gid=1

    Put in your own estimates of crowd size/ticket price/squad size and change other income/expenditure estimates. Having done so you can alter the players wage at the foot of the table for each period until the Net Cash flow row is just above turning red.for that period.

    ===================================================================

    Auldheid…many thanks for that. I look forward to “playing” with it. As with all such forecasts, the quality/validity of the underlying assumptions will prove or disprove the outcome(s)

    However, until such time as Mr Green Comes clean as to finance and investors/backers, it is largely an acedemic exercise.

  23. Allyjambo Taxpayer says:

    Rocky sullivan says:
    17/07/2012 at 10:58 am

    Months ago I suggested on here that the ‘sins’ of oldco should pass to whoever took over the SPL License as that license was contaminated. Now it looks as though that is the way Regan/SFA are looking at the SFA Membership and saying, correctly, you can’t have the history and Membership that currently belongs to Rangers FC(IA) without the responsibility for their crimes. As Sevco doesn’t have 3 years accounts etc it won’t be able to get this Membership, but should they (CG) accept the bad with the good of Rangers FC(IA)’s Membership then they are able to continue. I don’t know if this was in Regan’s plans all along, ie they get SFL1 membership but end up carrying so much baggage they’ll regret it, plus the football debts must be repaid pleasing Hearts, Dundee United, Celtic and, of course, UEFA. This is perhaps what UEFA, very quietly, told Regan had to be the outcome; Rangers FC could survive, but all football debts had to be repaid or Rangers FC was completely dead and any replacement could call itself what it liked, but it would never be Rangers FC, and had to meet all the criteria for any newclub in the SFL!

    I wonder if Regan is now playing hardball because they are now unsaveable – but was never actually playing as soft a ball as we all thought throughout the mess.

  24. threeamigos says:

    Could Nick Buckles of G4S be Doncaster’s long lost brother? Seems to me there’s certain traits.ie No clue as to what’s going on and in charge of a complete shambles.

  25. corsica says:

    Now, as I have stated previously, stalking someone is highly illegal in France and Monaco so I have absolutely no idea how someone can tell me that our hero CW boarded a plane this morning at 10.40 to Zurich (LX563). Maybe he has a business meeting there? Maybe it’s just a wild guess? 🙂

  26. tigertim says:

    When will the Scottish FA consider Rangers application for membership?

    Now that the Scottish Football League have made a conditional acceptance of Rangers FC in Irn Bru Division Three we will now consider the club’s application for membership transfer this week.
    ===============================================================
    What are the conditions of the acceptance?? Have they been publicised?
    Is there a vacancy yet, ehm, No, how can you therefore consider the application yet??

  27. Goosy says:

    Scottish FA issues Rangers update
    Tuesday, 17 July 2012

    Now that the status of Rangers FC has been clarified by the respective league bodies, the Scottish FA has compiled the following information to provide clarity and guidance on the remaining issues to be resolved.
    ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
    So the referees report on sectarian singing art the Killie game has been ignored despite it now being a criminal offense under recent legislation

  28. PTD says:

    Last time I looked RFC were drawing their last breaths. D&P had made off with a rather tattered RFC wallet after throwing out all the IOUs and selling the cadaver to Sevco. Sevco were going through its pockets hoping that something of value was left and trying on it’s clothes to see if anyone noticed the difference when they turned up at the office and asked to get paid.
    Now we’re told Sevco can have RFC’s old SFA license, but they’ll have to take the bad history with it?
    Eh naw!
    They can have the license if the SFA say so, but the history – good and bad – is gone.
    The punishments of the old club are the price of getting round this latest rule of the game, not a mechanism to allow Sevco to pretend to be something they aren’t.

    Besides, if he’s got any sense, Green will jump ship. HMRC will not take kindly to the deal being proposed.
    – Green is dangerously close to being deemed a de facto director of RFC(IA).
    – The value to Sevco of taking on the responsibilities of the old club in order to pretend to be them must be greater than the potential cost of taking them on. – Phoenixism
    – Someone from Sevco is going to have to sign something BEFORE the season starts that names them as “Rangers FC”, this can’t be done legally until 3 days after the season starts. – more Phoenixism with a sprinkling of contract breaking.
    – The lack of football crecitor’s rule in Scotland means football debts can’t be preferred over other debts. (Unless Sevco 5088 being incorporated in England gets around this – anyone?)
    At this rate, any bond Sevco may have to pay will amount to the total amount RFC(IA) owe and will be non-refundable.

  29. Scapa says:

    Mama Mia Giovanni, you are contesting our hero’s top billing for comedy gold

    http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-816272

  30. F.M. says:

    Apologies if already posted.

    http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-816272

    NEW TWIST IN RANGERS FOOTBALL CLUB SAGA: DI STEFANO CALLS IN THE FBI

    By OnlinePubCo | Posted 11 minutes ago | UK

    Giovanni Di Stefano a minority shareholder in The Rangers Football Club PLC yesterday delivered a letter to New York District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr requesting a criminal complaint against a number or individuals and organisations complicit in what he described as a “massive fraud” on the club.

    Yesterday The Sun newspaper ran the story of Di Stefano allegations in a letter that we published addressed to Duff & Phelps.

    “Duff & Phelps did their best to avoid receipt of my letter which infuriated me because as a shareholder I am entitled to answers. I then contacted the Office of Cyrus Vance Jr and filed a formal complaint because there are shareholders in America and D&P are a US company,” said Di Stefano.

    Yesterday the SPL ‘invited’ Di Stefano’s old club Dundee FC to the Scottish Premier League and confirmed that they would work with the Scottish Football Association to revamp Scottish Football. But Di Stefano was critical of the way that events are shaped to destroy Rangers Football Club.

    “Destroy the club and you partly destroy the evidence of blatant fraud,” he said.

    Di Stefano has stated that it is still not too late to mitigate the damages caused to the 1872 club that founded Scottish Football.

    “The way ahead is to admit Rangers and Dunfermline to the SPL so that the least damages are caused and then investigate in a proper manner what happened. It’s no use pardoning Rangers when they have been executed. We don’t want a Chilcot situation of having an enquiry ten years after the horse has well and truly bolted and probably ended up as corned beef already,” said Di Stefano.

    http://www.onlinepublishingcompany.info printed the full text of the letter to Cyrus Vance Jr the New York tough District Attorney.

    The Manhattan DA received the complaint just after 3pm yesterday. The son of the Secretary of State under the Carter Administration he is known for his tough stance of white collar crime and has considerable experience in criminal trials.

    Duff & Phelps were unavailable for comment.

  31. Weescotty says:

    I seem to remember an American going to a Texas judge to prevent a sale of a football club.
    Didn’t work out too well for him.
    Also seem to remember A British judge clearly stating the companies involved were British therefore jurisdiction clearly lay within the British judicial system.
    Hicks and Gillette another pair of asset stripping erseholes

  32. Casual Observer says:

    Corsica

    I am having a quiet chuckle at the remarkable coincidence of Our Hero flying on the same morning to the same destination as Sevco’s CEO.

    Of the 475 Million people in Europe, around 2.2 Million boarded a plane today, of which around 33,000 will get off at Zurich Airport.

    What are the chances?

  33. tenerifetim says:

    If Charlie and the Bhoys are flying to Tobleronesville who is at SFA today begging for a licence?

  34. Scapa says:

    Sandy and Ally, they have the most to apologise for…..

  35. JJ says:

    Scapa on 17/07/2012 at 1:16 pm

    ————

    Gonnae no dae that! I’m laughing so much I’m about to be asked to leave this coffee shop!

  36. layman00 says:

    any Craig Whyte impersonators willing.to call UEFA headquarters to discuss their scheduled meeting 🙂

  37. corsica says:

    Casual Observer on 17/07/2012 at 1:35 pm
     10 0 Rate This
    Corsica

    I am having a quiet chuckle at the remarkable coincidence of Our Hero flying on the same morning to the same destination as Sevco’s CEO.

    Of the 475 Million people in Europe, around 2.2 Million boarded a plane today, of which around 33,000 will get off at Zurich Airport.

    What are the chances?
    ********
    To be fair, our hero could just be visiting his portakabin

  38. Casual Observer says:

    Corsica

    Very true, but it’s quite a drive, scenic though it is, from Zurich across to Geneve. He’d have been quicker driving up from Monaco.

  39. Edgar Blamm says:

    This Giovanni Di Stefano guy is great.

    @DEVILSADVOKAT

    Those attempting to kill off RFC PLC are extremely rich, powerfull, influential and hold high offices and they use many lower echelons

    ‏@DEVILSADVOKAT

    ..promising them all sorts to ensure any investigation is killed off…in one jurisdiction or another a proper investigation must be held

    ‏@DEVILSADVOKAT

    ..and at same time RFC PLC not prejudiced…that is the only objective but also ALL are innocent until proven guilty and that MUST apply RFC

  40. redetin says:

    Is Charles Green meeting with UEFA:-
    (a) as appointee to RFC PLC (In Administration)
    (b) as chief executive of Sevco 5088 Limited
    (c) as chief executive of Sevco Scotland Limited
    (d) as all of the above

  41. diamondtim says:

    One would think Hughie Green is looking for the full wrath of FIFA & UEFA.

  42. Not The Huddle Malcontent says:

    Was thinking about the TV deal and the scraps we get from Sky

    recent figures on here show that in comparison to other “diddy” countries in Europe we are getting a raw deal.

    Now, Donkey has been running our product down – ably assisted by Raygun. To the point we expect that the poor Sky TV deal is going to be cut severely. it’s almost a given.

    Donkey should be nowhere near the negotiations to strike a new deal – it’s in his reputations interest to strike a bad deal as he can say “told you so” and it’s beyond his talent to get a good deal.

    One of the problems we have is a lack of alternative to Sky.

    I suggest that the NEW SPL/SFA/SFL CEO should make creating that alternative his priority.

    there are a couple of routes forward to increase teh value of the TV deal we can obtain.

    1. NO TV at all. Just black it out completely. If fans want to see a game, they have to go to a game. Boosting attendances – will that be enough to make up teh tv money? sponsors won’t be happy at that. It’s probably a non starter.

    2. No LIVE tv, but a highlights package. How much does the Beeb pay for MOTD and MOTD2 highlights? £180M for 4 years as the deal they struck last year – £45M a year – for HIGHLIGHTS. Taken on a population “pro rata” basis we should be pressuring the Beeb to support scottish football to an equal amount – say £4M a season.

    This would give us nationwide exposure and allow every game in the country to have a 3pm sat kick off – to suit the fans.

    3. NO LIVE TV – Extended/full match coverage.

    again, no live matches, sat 3pm kick offs – but delayed full 90 minute transmission of every game on a subscription channel basis. Basically a non live SPL TV where every top flight game would have a delayed full 90mins shown through the week.

    Sun – Fri each week (6 days) there would be one full 90 min game shown. Managers and/or players from each club AND A CURRENT REFEREE would be invited in to give their thoughts/opinions on the games. Punters pay a monthly or annual sub to get the channel. This could be expanded to have interviews, competitions, features, to show classic encounters. the footage could be used to compile merchandise DVD’s etc.

    4. Internet TV – companies like Apple, Google and BT are trying to dominate Internet TV broadcasting – could we sell exclusive rights to these guys – in additional to a traditional highlights broadcaster.

    5. SPL TV – lets do it ourselves – live games, highlight packages, club channels, PPV or subscription channels. have every game kick off on sat at 3pm and allow PPV viewers to watch any game of their choice live. Full highlight packages through the week for subscription viewers.

    This might not generate the huge sums that SKY are offering, but it gives us an alternative that lets us walk away from Sky.

    then as a support – we can effectively BOYCOTT Sky giving them 2 problems

    1. falling subscriber numbers
    2. nothing to fill their schedule with.

    instead of taking pennies from Sky, simply tell them to GTF and make a reasonable offer in line with the deals offered to other diddy countries.

    The bad publicity coupled with giving direct competing broadcasters much valued content should be enough to force an improved offer.

    Just a thought.

  43. parttimearab says:

    you might have thought that ticketus/octopus could have issued a statement, “for the avoidance of doubt”, that they have no direct or indirect financial involvement with sevco/blue pitch etc
    indeed have any of the hacks asked the question and/or had a reply?

  44. joe mccormack says:

    No update yet on RFC official site on ST details.

  45. joe mccormack says:

    parttimearab

    hacks asking difficult questions….get real.

    Souness, Wattie, Dodds etc etc all apparently bullet proof.

  46. Timalloy says:

    Not the Huddle…. I was going to post along same lines as you regarding television deal.
    I agree Doncaster should be nowhere near any negotiations. But surely a committee should be assessing feasibility of our own SPL tv.
    For a start take a look at what Belgium, Norway and especially Holland have done. The Eredivisie
    faced the same problems we are now facing but took the plunge and set up their own television channel which now has 600,000 subscribers.
    Now I know it would take some time for Scottish football tv to get as many subscribers, but look into feasibilty of it. Do some research, ask fans, contact ex pats abroad to see if they would contribute to SPL channel.
    Get a properly costed survey of how much it would cost to set up, how much would a subscription cost, and how many subscribers would be needed.
    Also as other people have said, if Sky start losing Scottish viewers they will more than likely up their offer.

  47. Trimm Trab says:

    Not The Huddle Malcontent says:
    17/07/2012 at 2:13 pm
    ——————————————–

    Sky would be damaging its brand in Scotland were it to ditch the SPL now so I really dont see that happening – its takes a long time to build up as many customers as they have. Plus they are still on a push to get people signed up for everything to gain further marketshare (broadband phone etc).

    Lets be honest – the SPL deal is a pee in the Ocean for Sky. I see them sticking with the current deal and looking to do a deal for Sevco games if they exist.

    As for the next deal they may just offer what we have had as the last deal – Doncaster will stand before us proclaming victory from the jaws of death and we should all worship him where in reality I expect Sky to decide whats happening and ND to grab it with both hands.

    If we had someone more experienced than Doncaster I would expect a better deal. Ive looked at Doncasters career and I honestly see nothing that suggests he is the man for this job. How did he end up in this position?

  48. iamacant says:

    redetin says:
    17/07/2012 at 2:07 pm

    Is Charles Green meeting with UEFA:-
    (a) as appointee to RFC PLC (In Administration)
    (b) as chief executive of Sevco 5088 Limited
    (c) as chief executive of Sevco Scotland Limited
    (d) as all of the above
    —————————————————————————————————–

    redetin, when I read this a comedy sketch immediately popped into my head. The one where Lee Evans is playing the interviewer, interviewee and the mistress negotiating his own pay rise 🙂

    Quite apt I thought.

    I cant post it as blocked by works firewalls.

  49. Rocky sullivan says:

    Scapa on 17/07/2012 at 1:48 pm
     7 0 Rate This
    Sandy and Ally, they have the most to apologise for…..

    ————————-

    Could not agree more. That pair between them mobilised the hordes into thinking they were a righteous, vengeance-administering, economic giant who had just been awoken.

    The reality is, that if there was someone in the death star who could have kept them both on a short leash between February and July, their clubs reality would be very different to what it is today.

  50. Althetim says:

    The SSN tabloid TV interview between Green & White this morning was pure comedy Gold. Charlie is blatantly pandering to the fans of Rangers(IA), trying manfully to persuade them to part with their cash by portraying an optimistic future and how he can talk such Colin Nish with a straight face is beyond me. Jim White is the perfect foil for Charlies’ brand of comedy. He’s an idiot.

    Moving from safe house to safe house……..LMFAO……….quality.

    CG has no interest in “Rangers” (or “The Rangers”) and his obvious mock concerns for the future of the Scottish game would be insulting if they weren’t hilarious.

    Question for you Chuckie – what was the last Scottish senior football match you attended? I’ll wager you’ve never been to one in your life. You have as much concern for the welfare of Scottish football as I have for the Hampshire Netball Leagues, with all due respect to them. Give up the pretence, cards on the table.