Love the blog, one of few places to get honest info.

Never been very impressed by him tbh.

Why would people treat it as anything other than exactly what it is.

You use the same transparent tactic constantly. This isn’t “whataboutery” then you do just that.

If you don’t want to do it then don’t. If you do then do. It’s just insulting everyone’s intelligence to pretend you aren’t.

There’s no need, people are used to it. Just stop lying about it.
__________________________________________________________________

I vociferously disagree Hugh.

—————————————————————–

You would. It doesn’t make it any less true though. You constantly say you are not going to do it, then do it anyway. I have no issue with you indulging in whataboutery, like I said just stop lying about it.

If you want me to insult your intelligence i can translate your original post.

What about Peter Lawwell, here’s a list of the companies he has been involved in. He’s every bit as bad as Craig Whyte.

Re your specious argument that you could have used any number of people to illustrate the point, you didn’t. You chose Peter Lawwell.

Fine if the SFL vote a newco Rangers back in but there is noway they can escape being expelled and demoted IF the become liquidated.

How can they avoid this? unless of course all existing rules are set aside.

Why would people treat it as anything other than exactly what it is.

You use the same transparent tactic constantly. This isn’t “whataboutery” then you do just that.

If you don’t want to do it then don’t. If you do then do. It’s just insulting everyone’s intelligence to pretend you aren’t.

There’s no need, people are used to it. Just stop lying about it.
__________________________________________________________________

I vociferously disagree Hugh. You have to agree that the main premise of this blog from day one is, what would consider, many educated people reading between the lines and offering up their opinions or views on whats going on.

When any of us do that, its my opinion, that the healthiest way for the blog to remain as it is, is for others to challenge that thinking in order for everyone else to conclude how relevant the opinion is.

In the instance of posting 15 or so dissolved companies and saying “oh oh look” i think its highly relevant, and not “whitabootery” for one of us to challenge that and show that this is not abnormal in the life of this type of character.

I posted Peter Lawwells record. I could easily have posted a number of people i know that would show similar records.

Just my opinion on what keeps the fire breathing in this blog.

=========================================================

Ezio Auditore da Firenze, on 31 October 2011 – 05:37 PM, said:

As a Hearts supporter I’m realistic enough to know we’re extremely unlikely to win the league & the odd cup wins are going to be pretty far apart. I’d like to think that we were at least competing on a level playing field though. Rangers have effectively bought multiple titles & cups and in doing so also deprived the other clubs in the league of prize money, better European spots also with more prize money & used the financial superiority that both of those bring to buy up talents from smaller clubs at knock down prices.

What’s fun about that? In an ideal world we’d have a more balanced & exciting league in which all clubs had a chance to build teams with a chance to win. I can accept that Rangers are always going to be a bigger & more successful club, I can’t accept that they’re allowed to cheat as well to hammer home their advantages especially if there’s little or no come-uppance.

In administration, and in trying to achieve a CVA, would even the secured creditor have to agree to the percentage amount repayable? Or can those who have that security walk away with their repayments before the others even enter the process?

Probably a largely irrelevant question as things probably aren’t going to pan-out that way. I’m just interested for the sake of being interested.

Thanks guys. Still loving the blog.